In today’s world, ambiguous issue as is, who is the real terrorist? It could a matter of opinion, not factual reality to determine what constitutes “terrorism’? The on going envisaged global irony in “war on terrorism” enlists cruel combination of probabilities, often self-defeating purpose and inhuman tragedies as plausible definitions and explanations. The American led “war on terrorism” exposes this bewildering and cynical framework of greed and tyranny being imposed on others. “Either you are with us or against us”, proclaimed President Bush, the draconian slogan shortly after the September 11 attacks in the US. The alleged Al-Qaida link to 9/11 attacks and Osma bin Laden, the accused mastermind, are not the stranger but part of the American global engagement history. Arundhati Roy said it well (the Infinite Algebra of Mercy): Bush and Osma are both extremists and unacceptable choices to the rest of the world…Osama bin Laden was created by the CIA and is wanted by FBI.
Financed by the corporate interest, the Western mass media is building vigorously the public psyche and perception to see the Muslims as the culprits waging war against the Christian West. The alleged myth that Islamic faith and Muslim culture are the breeding ground of terrorism remains a racially manufactured assumption and highly questionable theory in the real world affairs. The Project for the New American Century – PNAC, was formed in 1997 (long before the 9/11 crisis), with the participatory blessings of the American oil and gas cartel, better known as neo-conservatives including Dick Cheney, Donald Rumsfeld, Wolfwitz and many other leading agents of influence working in Strategic Policy Planning and the Defense portfolios within the American political echelon. All committed to dominate the global economy and the political powerhouse for America to become unrivaled superpower in the New World Order. 9/11 provided that much-needed conflict making opportunity to the PNAC visionary goals, strategic priorities and George Bush’s continued Presidency. The ‘war on terror’ is a self-contradictory phenomenon that represents the grand delusion of the 21st century proponent of the oil led American corporate leadership. Its sole aim is global monopoly of politics and economy by dehumanizing the rest of the living humanity. Geared towards the frenzy of World War Three, the American neocons leadership is increasingly becoming politically isolated, militarily belligerent and morally bankrupt and defeated, more so, the day photos of Abu Ghraib prison were made known to the morally conscientious humanity.
Their unilateral military engagements in Afghanistan and Iraq are producing disastrous human consequences for the people all over the globe. The American administration seems to have ignored the lessons of political and moral failure of the British Empire and colonialism. In a September 2005, interview with the CBC, American Congress Woman Eleanor Norton made a thought provoking observation when asked about the administration role and help to the people in New Orleans after the hurricane Katrina: “Americans are not used to being embarrassed and ashamed at the same time.” What happened in Louisiana and other gulf states after the storm, offers a glimpse of the overburdened and failing mind setting of the American leadership with no consideration for its people and their miserable plight.
They prepared America on a war footing, not for a legitimate cause but to control the oil industries and maintain the dollar market value.
Iraq and Afghanistan were seen as a necessary requisite to deceive the American public that Arabs and Muslims are the extremists and pose threats to American political hegemony. Whereas, today, more than 80% of the Muslim countries and rulers are maintained by the West and are under the direct political and economic control of the US and British Governments. One wonders, how could the subservient people and the rulers dare to challenge the colonial masters? Is it not the ruling America and British colonial elite actively engaged in terrorizing the Muslims all over the globe? Are they fearful of the new educated generations of Muslims and their democratic indoctrination that could undo their inherited lordship in the former colonies? After all, Muslims were considered just as ‘subjects’ of the Empire, not citizens with rights and entitlement to human ‘freedom.’ Is that a page of the history? Or is it news to the former colonial bandmasters? Was the colonialism a choice of the liberal democracy? Wars do not grow anything consumable but destroy human lives and habitats. Whereas the corporate interests and markets have no human social values, nor do they have moral accountability. It is increasingly action-reaction game masked and staged at the global theatre of absurdity starring Bush, Blair, Militarism, the mass media and General Musharaf as an added attraction to ensure smooth services of trilateral businesses across the globe. Exsorbent profits looted by the oil companies are not going to be reimbursed to the public at gas stations. Would the American neocons rebuild the lost lives and human habitats in Afghanistan and Iraq and Pakistan? After carpet bombing of the Afghan graveyards and major Iraqi towns, could they bring to life what was deliberately destroyed under the PNAC planned “war on terrorism”? Their goal was ‘regime change’ but they alleged WMD which could not be found throughout the international search in Iraq. It was a lie, a false pretext acclaimed tactfully to deceive the mankind. Could Bush, Blair and the neocons be held responsible under the international Geneva protocols of crimes against the humanity?
Humans have faces, bodies and souls but the modern warfare knows neither body nor face when it comes to killing. Hitler and Mussolini were the by- products of the European nationalism but after ages, the European once again failed to impart real world knowledge and experience of the two World Wars to safeguard the future generations from the scourge of national wars and colonialism. The American administration appears active and persistent to wage traditional and innovative new wars against the newly created and targeted enemy – Islam and Muslims.
They do need conflicts and wars for economic and political survival and control of the global resources. PNAC philosophy embedded in American unilaterism sees war as a positive necessity for development and domination. Hurricane Katrina and the aftermath are not taken seriously as the first installment of Godly reminders to the American leadership for causing deaths and destruction in Iraq. Even if President Bush and his faithful neocons pretend that ‘it is business as usual’, the prevalent realities on the ground speak a different language. The American masses are reasonably conscious of being dragged into the Iraq war, they disapprove and protested. Cindy Sheehan and her movement offer a peaceful role model for political activism across the United States. But the controlling interest of the ‘war on terror’ rests with Bush, Cheney and the instigator neocons, wherein the American masses appear helpless spectator, not active participants in the making and running of the liberal democracy, more of a forged democracy of the few. In 1990, Dick Cheney, then the Secretary to Senior Bush wrote: “whoever controls the flow of the Persian Gulf oil has a stranglehold not only on our economy but also on the other countries of the world as well.” The obsession of that stranglehold rests with Bush, Cheney and Blair – all actively supporting the crusade against Islam and Muslims. It is the humanity that suffers, not the affluent leaders. There are serious dangers to enflame the ethnic and religious wars across the globe. Robert Fisk, the British journalist recently noted: “Before the (Iraq) war, our governments warned us of threats that did not exist, now they hide from us, the threats that do exist.”
The American led wars in Iraq, Afghanistan and Pakistan have made the global system of states redundant and the United Nations particularly, an impotent body meant for discussions and ineffective role play in peace making or sustainable system of the working of the member states according to its mandate. The UN has failed to stop American and British encroachment in the Middle East, ethnically charged “war on terror”, the global village and the ideals of the safety and security of the world. The ideals of international peace and harmony have been dashed away by the few – be it President Bush or Osma bin Laden, none of them are acceptable choices to the civilized humanity.
They pursue self-motivated greed complementing ignorance, is the driving force to manipulate the world, overwhelmed with action-reaction strategies of the past, dull, dead and irrelevant history. For their self-centered survival, they appear devoid of the reason, human spirit and intellectual foresight to face the realities of living history. Most of the humanity is acutely aware of the fallacy of the terrorism myth, for it is not Islam, Christianity or Judaism but those few who act and react to stranglehold the humanity for oil resources and monetary controls. History shall judge the leaders and nations by their action, not by their claims.